Researches and creates with your team.
Chat with the Superagent, Plannk’s AI. For complete studies, the Resolver plans the steps and delivers in your chosen format.
Superagent · everyday work
You guide the work through conversation.
- Consults the files and studies you can access.
- Searches sector databases and websites.
- Revises documents, spreadsheets, charts, images and maps at your request.
Resolver · licensing opinion
Reads the record and checks environmental requirements.
Plannk analyzes the public licensing record for the Rondonópolis Rail Spur in Mato Grosso, Brazil, at IBAMA, Brazil’s federal environmental agency. The request is condensed; the opinion excerpt is the Portuguese original.
- Process and attachments
- 7 administrative volumes
- Environmental study
- Page references
- 24 license requirements
- Evidence of compliance
- Unsubstantiated items
- Status classification
- Technical summary
- Limits of the evidence
- Findings by requirement
- Material for review
Record analyzed
| Documents | Count |
|---|---|
| Files | 322 |
| Pages | 7,753 |
| Volumes | 7 |
24 requirements in the opinion
| Classification | Count |
|---|---|
| Met | 10 |
| Partially met | 6 |
| Not met | 3 |
| Insufficient evidence | 3 |
| Informational | 2 |
Classification in the published opinion.
The published opinion records gaps in the evidence, including the standalone license-renewal decision not found in the record.
The published opinion records gaps in the evidence, including the standalone license-renewal decision not found in the record.
The classification describes the published opinion: 10 requirements met, 6 partially met, 3 not met, 3 with insufficient evidence and 2 informational. The 49 minutes are execution time and exclude human review.
- Defines what needs checking in the licensing process.
- Organizes documents, requirements and the opinion into three workstreams.
- Consults a record of 322 files and 7,753 pages.
- Classifies the 24 requirements using the opinion’s evidence.
- Identifies limits in the evidence about renewal.
- Brings the findings together in the opinion published in Portuguese.
- 49 min of execution. Your team reviews and signs off.
What did this opinion cost?
The same Rondonópolis Rail Spur opinion from Mato Grosso, Brazil, analyzes 24 requirements using a 7,753-page record. The comparison includes the team’s work through the decision.
Open the full opinion. Opens in a new tab.| The traditional wayselective reading of the record | With a chat assistantChatGPT, Claude or Copilot | In Plannkone request to the Resolver, 49 min of execution | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated time from request to decision | 2 to 3 weeks | 2 weeks | 2 to 3 days |
| Estimated cost of the work | about R$15,0003 people, team R$15,000, AI and tools R$0 | about R$10,0003 people, team R$10,000, AI and tools R$270 | about R$1,8001 to 2 people, team R$1,700, AI and tools R$100 |
| Estimated team hours | about 140 h | about 90 h | about 15 h |
Hours by stage
| Stage | The traditional way | With a chat assistant | In Plannk |
|---|---|---|---|
| reading the record | 86 h | 43 h | no hours |
| license conditions | 24 h | 15 h | no hours |
| drafting | 16 h | 9 h | no hours |
| request and coordination | no hours | 11 h | 1 h |
| review and sign-off | 14 h | 13 h | 14 h |
Scenario dated September 23, 2026: estimated stage hours and lead times; R$111 per team hour (R$11,500 monthly × 1.70 ÷ 176 h), using the Robert Half 2026 Salary Guide. Opens in a new tab. as a reference. Chat: three subscriptions for half a month plus US$20, at R$5.40/US$ (R$270). Plannk: about 15 h of preparation, checking and sign-off, plus an estimated R$100 in credits for execution and edits, excluding the monthly subscription. Recorded execution took 49 min; human hours and total lead time are estimates. All costs refer to this Brazilian case and are shown in reais.
Superagent · leadership
Highlights pending project decisions.
Plannk brings together tasks, meetings and studies from projects you can access.
Frequently asked questions
How does project context help?
The Superagent consults files, meetings, tasks and studies you can access. The Resolver uses those references for the requested work. AI models and tools are included in the platform, without a separate subscription for each provider.
When should I use the Superagent or the Resolver?
In the Superagent, you guide each step in conversation. In the Resolver, you set the objective, format and effort and follow the execution, then request changes in the same conversation.
Does the Superagent see every project in the company?
Only the projects you can access. Ask about meetings, tasks, deadlines, budgets and studies across projects; a configured Resolver automation prepares and sends the summary to your chosen recipients.
Do I need a complete request before starting?
No. Explain the decision you need to support and what you want to receive, even if it involves several files. The Resolver clarifies audience, constraints, sources and format before starting.
How is the study reviewed?
The Resolver checks sources, calculations and consistency before delivery. You perform the final technical review.
Can I close the page while the Resolver is working?
Yes. Work continues with the page closed. When you return, open the conversation to follow or review it; use Stop to cancel.
What happens when my files disagree with an external source?
Specify the priority document, period or source. If that is unclear, Plannk shows the discrepancy for you to decide.
When does a revision still belong to the same request?
Changes to content, structure, depth and presentation stay in the same conversation. If the objective, audience or scope changes completely, start a new request.