Plannk

Across all your work

Plannk is the work platform that integrates processes, knowledge, people and AI.

Explore the casesView plans

Plannk is where your team works with AI.

Today, an important decision waits weeks for a study that passes through many hands. Someone researches, someone else downloads the official data, a third person reads the documents, and the numbers and the presentation wait until the end. A chat assistant shortens each task, but it returns drafts, and in every conversation someone explains the context again.

Plannk does all of that work in one place, from the research to the final file, without a subscription for each AI vendor. Your team reviews and decides.

Plannk keeps up with how AI evolves and uses the best model at each step of the work.

When a better or cheaper model appears, Plannk starts using it, and what your team built in the project stays the same.

You drop in the problem and the work comes back complete.

The scenario follows an investment desk deciding on a port terminal concession. From the first meeting to the routine that watches the decision, every stage happens in the same project.

  1. Meeting

    What the committee decides becomes a task in the project plan.

    Plannk joins the meeting on the calendar, in Meet, Teams or Zoom. About half an hour after it ends, the minutes and the actions with owners are ready, and each action you confirm becomes a project task.

  2. Data

    The numbers come from the official databases, with nobody downloading a spreadsheet.

    Ana's task becomes a question answered in the official database itself: for a Brazilian port, the ANTAQ records from 2019 to 2025. Plannk works the same way with the SEC, Eurostat and Brazil's central bank and IBGE, and moves through sites that need filters and forms.

    Port cargo movements

    How do cargo movements at Imbituba vary by year and cargo profile?

    Source
    ANTAQ · Brazilian port cargo movements
    Requested period
    2019–2025
    Measure
    Gross weight

    Million tonnes per year

    2019
    5.76
    2024
    8.32
    2025
    7.07

This is the path a real request took.

An investment director has to decide whether to pursue a container terminal concession at the Port of Gulfport. In two and a half hours, the request became the study below.

The request arrives and becomes a work plan.

Before any research, Plannk turns the question into a capital decision and lists fourteen fronts of work, starting by checking that the terminal in the statistics is the one the concession would cover.

A question
Reference files
Spreadsheet data
Research links
Previous conversations
Decision criteria
Port infrastructurePursue a Gulf Coast terminal concession, or pass?

An investor must decide whether to pursue an unsolicited proposal, wait for a formal RFP or walk away from a container terminal concession at the Port of Gulfport, Mississippi.

Berth already leased

The accounts of the port authority itself showed the only container berth leased to Ports America since 2023, with options to 2063

Cover of the Gulfport container terminal pre-feasibility study

The official statistics and the records of the port authority correct the premise.

Plannk crossed the Corps of Engineers cargo statistics and the federal container counts with the statute and accounts of the authority: the only container berth had been leased to Ports America since 2023, with options to 2063. Demand, hurricane exposure and Gulf competition were sized against the real terminal.

Port infrastructurePursue a Gulf Coast terminal concession, or pass?

An investor must decide whether to pursue an unsolicited proposal, wait for a formal RFP or walk away from a container terminal concession at the Port of Gulfport, Mississippi.

Berth already leased

The accounts of the port authority itself showed the only container berth leased to Ports America since 2023, with options to 2063

Cover of the Gulfport container terminal pre-feasibility study

The study prices three scenarios and recommends holding capital.

The study came out with three demand scenarios to 2040, three investment scenarios built from crane and berth benchmarks, the lease precedents of Baltimore and Wilmington, and a critique of the recommendation itself. Text, spreadsheets and charts went through a second review before publication.

Port infrastructurePursue a Gulf Coast terminal concession, or pass?

An investor must decide whether to pursue an unsolicited proposal, wait for a formal RFP or walk away from a container terminal concession at the Port of Gulfport, Mississippi.

Berth already leased

The accounts of the port authority itself showed the only container berth leased to Ports America since 2023, with options to 2063

Cover of the Gulfport container terminal pre-feasibility study
Open the full study. Opens in a new tab.

The next decision starts from the study kept in the project.

The study stays in the project as a reference, and reviewing the triggers comes in as a suggested action for the team. The same path serves other desks: a tax opinion, the price of an office floor, a chain's expansion.

Pursue a Gulf Coast terminal concession, or pass?

Cover of the Gulfport container terminal pre-feasibility study
Project referenceStudy published
  • Review the triggers that reopen the decisionSuggested action
  • Check assumptions against new evidenceSuggested action
Explore projects

  1. Delivery

    The presentation reaches the committee ready, in the company's document template.

    The study kept in the project becomes the committee's presentation and spreadsheet, which Plannk reviews before they reach the team. In 91 of every 100 jobs, nobody changed the document after delivery, and any remaining edit is asked for inside PowerPoint itself.

  2. Routine

    Every Monday, a routine checks whether the decision still holds.

    The study recommended holding capital, so reviewing the triggers became an automation: Plannk reruns the research and the navigation on the regulator's and the port authority's sites and emails the result to whoever follows the decision.

An opinion that would cost about R$10,000 with a chat assistant comes to about R$1,800 in Plannk.

Estimated time to decision and total cost for three ways of producing the same licensing opinion.
The traditional wayWith a chat assistantIn Plannk
Time to decision2 to 3 weeks2 weeks2 to 3 days
Total cost, estimateabout R$15,000about R$10,000about R$1,800

Estimate for the licensing opinion on the Rondonópolis Rail Spur, a public process at Brazil’s IBAMA.

Open the full opinion. Opens in a new tab.See the full comparison

Each profession brings a different decision down the same path.

View all cases
  • Cover of the Project Iris confidential teaser for an ophthalmology network
    Healthcare M&A adviser

    How do you sell a clinic network without naming it?

    The teaser combined clinical scale, financial performance, growth levers and transaction structure into an investment-bank narrative ready to circulate among funds.

    Open the full presentation. Opens in a new tab.
  • Cover of the memorandum on California property transfers to a family LLC
    Tax attorney

    The memorandum separated the transfer-tax and reassessment risks, compared the available structures and closed on a recommendation tied to the family plan.

    Open the full document. Opens in a new tab.
  • Opening of the Brickell office pricing study
    Real estate asset manager

    What asking price should you set for a Brickell office floor?

    The analysis compared income-based and comparable-property valuations, recommended rent and sale prices and showed how time-to-lease and discounts change the go-to-market strategy.

    Open the full page. Opens in a new tab.
  • Cover of the coffee-chain expansion presentation comparing three cities
    Expansion director

    Which city gets the coffee chain’s next stores?

    The scoring matrix produced a winner and a three-wave plan with progression gates, investment per store and a fallback route.

    Open the full presentation. Opens in a new tab.
  • São Paulo official gazette: three publications, in Portuguese
    Tool · Navigation

    Navigation monitored and structured official-gazette publications.

    Publications structuredThe commitment, the land transfer and the amendment come out with values and dates
    Open the full sweep (in Portuguese). Opens in a new tab.
  • Brazilian storage study: owned capacity of 216 thousand tonnes per year at volumes of 300, 450 and 600 thousand tonnes
    Tool · Financial modeling

    The model showed that owned silos do not pay back the investment.

    Negative NPV at all three volumesOwned capacity stays at 216 thousand t/year, and the excess remains outsourced
    Open the full study (in Portuguese). Opens in a new tab.
  • Redrawn map from the study: 14 road routes from 12 Southern Brazilian municipalities to the Port of Santos
    Tool · Maps

    The map traced the way from Southern Brazil's mines to the Port of Santos.

    12 origin municipalitiesParaná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul, with a shared destination at the Port of Santos
    See the map in Data and Markets

Part of the daily work at

  • Garín Partners
  • TA Homes
  • Bites

All of this is one platform.

Everyday work goes through the Superagent, the Resolver takes on the complete study, and the six areas work on the same project.

Plannk was built to operate in an organization: each person sees only the projects where they have a role, the company can require two-step verification and the client follows the work through the portal. Plannk's team implements the process's own document templates and integrations.

See the security controlsSee customization
Files and memory

The project keeps up to 5,000 files and brings that context to every request.

The first request can be a job that is already on your desk.

Choose a plan and describe the first job with the files you already have: this week's memo, study or meeting agenda. The Free plan already covers a first document, and you review the result before taking it to the team.

View plansExplore the cases